恰同学少年2002

新銳演員韓寧與曾榮獲北影最佳新演員的余佩真主演，與被稱為「推理鬼才」導演文二北投，將整部作品皆遊走於現實與虛幻之間。余（韓寧 飾）被新政權指控隱瞞叛軍所在地後展開逃亡。被追捕的當下，僅存的逃生方式，就是找到願意幫助她整容並協助逃脫的神祕女孩蓮（余佩真 飾）。但跟蓮相遇後，余卻因為蓮不可思議的能力和迷人的個性不可自拔，陷入了一個難以區分虛實的奇幻世界......。

　　越战时期，美国位于华盛顿特区的石花园，葬着为数众多在越战上殉职的美国军人。《教父》《战栗游戏》詹姆斯肯恩饰演哈塞德军官，深信越战是一场打不赢的战事，相反的，士兵威洛一生最大的职志就是代表国家上战场，好好打一场胜战荣返家园。哈塞德没办法劝阻威洛把自己送到最前线，他唯一能为这个朋友做的，就是──拖延，同时鼓励他好好找回他和瑞秋（《他们的故事》《油炸绿蕃茄》《玫瑰花床》玛丽史都麦特森饰）的感情……

上篇中，夜神月（藤原龙也 饰）设计除掉了女友和跟踪自己的FBI的探员，趁机混进了调查本部，但是，L（松山健一 饰）对他的怀疑并没有结束，新一轮的智力游戏继续进行。
与死神硫克个性迥异的死神雷姆把另外一本“死亡笔记”扔到人间，得到它的是极度崇拜“基拉”的少女弥海砂（户田惠梨香 饰），她还以一半性命为代价得到了夜神月所没有的死神之眼。并主动和夜神月联系，答应协助他除掉L，条件是让月做自己的男朋友。聪明的L先发制人，将弥海砂关进了基拉对策室，夜神月为了救弥海砂，也为了自保，想到了一个绝妙的办法。
同时，因为跟踪报道“基拉”事件而风头大劲的樱花电视台发生了一连出人意料的事情，主播高田清美（片濑那奈 饰）追踪基拉的过程中发现了不为人知的秘密，随即第三名基拉出现了......
两个死神，两本“死亡笔记”，三个基拉，一切扑朔迷离；两个算无遗漏的天才，谁最终能够洞悉事实的真相？谁才是“死亡笔记”上最后的名字？

　　故事发生在1970年代。某日黄昏，罗二叔的女儿碧桃（迟蓬 饰）赶着一辆破车前往罗家村，车上坐着被打倒的原地委书记谷铁铮（位北原 饰）以及华侨出身的戈弋（米迪奇 饰）。戈弋怀抱儿子沉香，妻子不久前死于干校。在碧桃家虽有全家人照顾，但带一个吃奶的孩子毕竟很不方便。戈弋无奈写信向亲戚求助帮助抚养儿子，不料此举招来牢狱之灾。碧桃出于同情竭力相帮，被恋人玉生（徐为平 饰）发觉。公社把工农兵大学生名额给了根红苗正的碧桃和玉生，在填表时碧桃遭革委会徐主任调戏，她愤然回家。不久村里传出她和戈弋之间莫须有的绯闻，罗二叔（贾六 饰）自感老脸没处撂，一气之下将她赶出家门。碧桃忍辱负重，决心把沉香抚养大......

　　Successful architect Will Roberts organizes a grand surprise birthday party for his wife Mandy with their daughter Kelly and college days friend, only to be told afterward she wants a divorce to lead her own life. Soon each spouse commits to another lover.

　　这是一部心理惊悚片，讲述了一对年轻的已婚夫妇在几英亩土地上买了一栋漂亮的纳帕谷房子，结果他们却发现卖家拒绝交房。

对于新闻记者来说，每一次赶往新闻现场都是一次同行间的赛车比赛。《香港日报》的老记者阿苦（周华健 饰）浸淫行业多年，这天却因为采编不力被主编痛批。同日，从美国留学归来的新丁记者Peter王（吴彦祖 饰）到报馆报到，主编顺势将Peter塞给阿苦照顾。报社之花Joey（张可颐 饰）决定采访为女同学出头反遭退学处理的学生社团分子阿伟，隐瞒身份接近后者。另一方面，阿苦为了采访珠宝展拜访担任展览安保的老朋友麦警官，希望得到独家消息，Peter则得到了一个新手任务：采访因为交通事故陷入窘境的孤儿姐弟三人。三人为了各自的新闻努力与当事人沟通调查，引发了三段充满真情的故事……

故事改编自真实事件，揭露隐藏在新闻背后、鲜为人知的残疾院舍真相。新闻社接获一宗有关残疾院舍“彩桥之家”虐待院友的线报，侦查小组为揭露残疾院舍监管问题，记者晓琪（余香凝 饰）潜入院舍，揭发内里的非人道生活，寻找日光之下的残酷真相。

35岁的儿童读物插画家朱丽叶回到家乡与她所爱的人度过了两周的时光：一位神志不清的父亲；一个姐姐，她有更好的事情要担心，她的孩子、她的工作、她乏味的丈夫和她的情人；缺席的母亲和失去理智的祖母。埋藏的记忆、不言而喻的真相和家庭秘密浮出水面……

　　Set at the turn of the century, the story concerns a Polish poet living in Cracow who has decided to marry a peasant girl. The wedding is attended by a heterogenous group of people from all strata of Polish society, who dance, get drunk and lament Poland's 100-year-long division of Poland under Russia, Prussia, and Austria. The bridegroom, a painter friend, and a journalist each in turn is confronted with spectres of Polish past. In the end a call to arms is called but turns out to be a hoax.

　　This early 70's giallo by Umberto Lenzi is certainly among the best in his filmography and also in the whole genre. Personally I think Lenzi's best films are the funny cartoon-turned-film Kriminal, the stylish giallo Seven Blood-Stained Orchids, the explosive Napoli violenta and this. In the eighties he did plenty of film trash in form of Eaten Alive, Hitcher in the Dark or Black Demons, all of which are ripping something off and/or very dull and slow moving. Knife of Ice came when the giallo boom was at its hottest and the result is convincing.
　　Technically the film is superb, containing great cinematography in the beginning when we learn about the main character's trauma towards trains. From this point on, Lenzi shows us his ability to benefit the widescreen and, for example, the bicycle ride near the forest is genuinely beautiful! This scene also shows Lenzi's ability to build suspense, very slowly but meaningfully. After all, there aren't so many murders in the whole film, only the suspense circulating around the murderer's identity.
　　One suspect is a devil worshipper which brings new aspects to the mystery. Since the final scene takes place in a church, one can wonder if Lenzi wanted to comment on something, maybe the hypocritical morale of church and superstition. The main character (Carrol Baker) is mute which demands a lot from her face and eyes. The actress works very well, giving us a believable performance circulating around the emotions of fear and mental pain. The other actors are good, too. The finally, however, may not give too positive a sight about female sex since they all are expressed rather negatively in the film, one way or another. Still this is easily among the most noteworthy in the genre, not as bloody as the Argento films, for example, but equally suspenseful and visually also interesting.